Pages 45-49 from FO 371 110691 - Atomic Energy

This document provides commentary on President Eisenhower's speech to the United Nations Assembly, specifically focusing on two aspects. The first part of the speech discusses the horrors of atomic war and the relative superiority of the United States. The second part proposes the establishment of a United Nations development agency and an International Atomic Bank to reduce world tension and atomic weapon stockpiles.

Regarding the first part, there are no specific comments except for the observation that both the US and USSR stockpiles are expected to increase significantly in the coming years. In terms of the proposal for a development agency and atomic bank, the following comments are made:

1. The President's proposal implies a departure from the 1946 US plan for atomic control, which is now considered more difficult to implement than previously thought.

2. It is technically and administratively feasible to establish an international agency for atomic power station development. This would reduce duplication of efforts, particularly if smaller European projects are integrated into the new agency. A research and development establishment and an engineering design organization would be necessary.

3. The proposal to establish a World Bank for uranium and fissile materials is also technically feasible. The bank would require accounting procedures and could receive new fissile material produced in power breeder reactors. It should be designed to be secure against surprise seizures.

The document expresses suspicion and concerns about the proposals, suggesting that they may primarily benefit the United States and potentially disadvantage the UK's position in the Commonwealth and overseas markets. It is noted that the Americans would likely dominate the advisory organization due to their extensive atomic energy infrastructure. The UK's ability to participate is currently limited due to a lack of staffing, but improvement is expected in the next few years.

Additionally, the document highlights the potential for Commonwealth cooperation in atomic power development and cautions against the proposals interfering with existing plans. The Western European nations are already moving towards integration in nuclear power production, and the UK is collaborating with Norway and Switzerland in unclassified fields.

Overall, the document reflects a critical analysis of President Eisenhower's proposals, discussing technical feasibility, potential advantages, and concerns regarding their implementation and impact.